In October 2000, the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) Commission issued its report declaring that there was no single technological solution to the protection of minors online. Having served on that Commission, I remember well the many hours we spent testing and evaluating numerous age verification methods - from credit cards to government-issued IDs - as a means to better keep kids away from harmful content. More work was needed by industry, we concluded.
Fast forward 25 years and we’re still working on it. But unlike the state of technology at the turn of the century, we are getting tantalizingly close to a solution or set of technological means to accurately verify an adult’s or minor’s age without jeopardizing their personal information. Effective age assurance, which is privacy preserving, has been the Holy Grail of the online safety community for three decades.
As recently as November 2022, we issued a research report outlining parents’ and teens’ attitudes and experiences with various age assurance methods. We found a majority of parents open to the idea of biometrics (such as facial age estimation) being used as a part of an age verification process. And a year later, in a FOSI white paper, we laid out the principles of proportionality: developing tools based on the level of risk of a site, app or service. We also outlined the inherent tensions between effectiveness and intrusiveness, between safety and privacy.
So here we are in 2025 and there are now numerous regulations, laws and proposed legislation at the state, federal and international levels all demanding the sites, apps, operating systems and devices all provide and enforce age assurance methods to keep kids from adult material and, in some cases, from adults themselves. Meta has mounted a large-scale media and lobbying campaign to persuade legislators that age verification should take place at the app store level, although there are many issues with that approach as well.
In the meantime, Google and Apple have both offered tech solutions to counter Meta’s push. Third party vendors such as Private Identity, k-ID and Yoti have stepped up their efforts to provide safe, secure and private verification tools that have the potential to be a part of a larger, industry-wide effort to finally reach a consensus on the best way to provide age assurance that will satisfy not only legislators, but also parents and the kids themselves.
I am hopeful that, this year, we will see a major coming together of industry players and lawmakers to finally agree upon a set of solutions that will bring us all - kids and adults, alike - to more private, more secure and most importantly, a safer means of accessing apps, games, websites and platforms.
Your information will be subject to a different privacy policy that we recommend you review. FOSI has no control over the content of an external site.