Should We Protect or Empower Our Kids? Yes.

November 19, 2024

Parenting is hard. Overseeing our children’s online lives is harder still. Some parents, particularly during the teen years, throw up their hands and give up even trying to control what their kids are doing on their phones, tablets, and laptops. It feels overwhelming, exhausting, and like an unwinnable fight.

Like so much of our modern life, attitudes towards parenting in the digital age have become polarized. Some take a liberal or permissive approach and simply state that they trust their kids and leave them to their own devices. According to the Mayo Clinic’s categorization, authoritarian parents are more likely to impose strict rules, utilize parental controls and, in more extreme cases, apply spyware to snoop on their offspring’s phones without their knowledge or consent.

And then there’s a category of caregivers that falls somewhere between these two poles. The authoritative parent is open and flexible in their approach, maintaining healthy boundaries and enforcing consequences when appropriate. These parents involve their kids, particularly the older ones, in setting the rules and even consulting with them on the punishments if those rules are broken. 

These authoritative parents are more likely to empower their kids to make good choices online. A shift takes place, somewhere around the age of 13 or so, when helicopter parents become more like co-pilots with their teens - learning, exploring and even playing together. This kind of partnership creates an atmosphere of trust, while also maintaining the parents’ right to verify and take action when necessary. 

In the US, there is a strong emphasis on parental rights. In some states, parental authority over their kids' online access and behavior is beginning to be encoded into law. These bills reinforce a traditional position of parenting that, in many ways, denies that children have some rights, too. Or to put it another way, between birth and the age of majority, a minor has no rights to privacy, speech, or assembly. But at 18, they magically inherit all of these rights overnight. 

In Europe, there is a tradition and a promotion of children’s rights. As a child grows into their early teens, they are increasingly seen as autonomous human beings, while still dependent on their parents for their basic needs. There is an assumption that a 17-year-old, though still legally a minor, has far greater freedoms than a 7-year-old. Their rights to expression and privacy grow slowly, to begin with, and then more quickly as they emerge from puberty and move into secondary education or high school. 

So should we protect or empower our kids online? This should not be an either/or question but should be a both/and more answer. Yes, of course, parents of small children up through elementary and middle school should educate themselves and use parental controls on all the internet-enabled devices that their kids have access to. It would be grossly irresponsible (not to mention overly permissive) to allow a preschooler or 10-year-old unfettered access to the web. 

But when your child reaches the teen years, those controls begin to either come off or you find that your teenager has figured out ways to circumvent those controls. At this moment, it is time to sit down with them and re-write the rules of the road. Ask them to show you the online safety tools that social media sites and game consoles provide for teens and young people to use to block, report, stay private, or otherwise control their online environments. Have conversations about what they are doing online, encourage them to think critically about what they read and see, and support their digital development, not from a place of fear, but to build their knowledge and understanding.  

Help your kids become self-sufficient, resilient, and self-regulating so that when they leave home, either for college or elsewhere, they have the internal tools they’ll need to deal with the worst and the best the digital world has to offer. After all, empowerment is the best form of protection.

Written by

Stephen Balkam

For the past 30 years, Stephen Balkam has had a wide range of leadership roles in the nonprofit sector in both the US and UK. He is currently the Founder and CEO of the Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI), an international, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. FOSI’s mission is to make the online world safer for kids and their families. FOSI convenes the top thinkers and practitioners in government, industry and the nonprofit sectors to collaborate and innovate and to create a “culture of responsibility” in the online world.

Prior to FOSI, Stephen was the Founder and CEO of the Internet Content Rating Association (ICRA) and led a team which developed the world’s leading content labeling system on the web. While with ICRA, Stephen served on the US Child Online Protection Commission (COPA) in 2000 and was named one of the Top 50 UK Movers and Shakers, Internet Magazine, 2001.

In 1994, Stephen was named the first Executive Director of the Recreational Software Advisory Council (RSAC) which created a unique self-labeling system for computer games and then, in 1996, Stephen launched RSACi – a forerunner to the ICRA website labeling system. For his efforts in online safety, Stephen was given the 1998 Carl Bertelsmann Prize in Gutersloh, Germany, for innovation and responsibility in the Information Society and was invited to the first and subsequent White House Internet Summits during the Clinton Administration.

Stephen’s other positions include the Executive Director of the National Stepfamily Association (UK); General Secretary of the Islington Voluntary Action Council; Executive Director of Camden Community Transport as well as management positions at the Institute of Contemporary Arts (London) and Inter-Action. Stephen’s first job was with Burroughs Machines (now Unisys) and he had a spell working for West Nally Ltd – a sports sponsorship PR company.

Stephen received a BA, magna cum laude, in Psychology from University College, Cardiff, Wales in 1977. A native of Washington, DC, Stephen spent many years in the UK and is now has dual citizenship. He writes regularly for the Huffington Post, appears often on TV and has appeared on nationally syndicated TV and radio programs such as MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC and has been interviewed by leading newspapers such as the Washington Post, New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, radio and in the mainstream press. He has given presentations and spoken in 15 countries on 4 continents.