
State-level leadership in online safety is currently facing converging pressures from two distinct federal directions. This renewed debate over preemption–the constitutional principle by which federal law supersedes state law–places the future of digital consumer protection at a critical juncture. Ideally, federal law should set a baseline floor of online safety protections that states can build on top of, within reason. However, absent effective federal action, states should be allowed to pass policies that keep their residents safe online.
This piece explores the growing tension between federal deregulation efforts and congressional pushes for stronger child online safety, using Florida’s proposed AI Bill of Rights as a case study. It highlights how preemption and conditional funding threaten state-led protections and outlines a path forward focused on federal privacy standards, thoughtful age assurance, and coordinated policies that protect kids while supporting innovation.